Wednesday, 17 April 2013


MISCONCEPTIONS

The Golden Calf – the return     

Exodus ch32:1- 35 describes the sin of the Golden Calf.  It was in violation of the 2nd commandment just given 40 days before at Sinai and rabbinic commentaries suggest the ‘stain’ of this sin and paganism linger in the Jewish soul to this day.

What is usually overlooked and little taught is that the Golden Calf did not disappear with its destruction by Moses.  It reappeared some 500 years later in Jewish history at the division of the Jewish kingdom.

When the 10 tribes of the north separated soon after King Solomon’s death, and created their own kingdom under Jeroboam ben Nebat, he built two temples: one in the south, just above Jerusalem, at Beth-el, and another at the far north at Dan. That way his people would not need go to Jerusalem for Jewish festivals commanded in the Torah.

Each of these temples had at its centre a Golden Calf statue.

 

1 Kings ch 12:
 

26 And Jeroboam said in his heart: 'Now will the kingdom return to the house of David.
 
27 If this people go up to offer sacrifices in the house of the LORD at Jerusalem, then will the heart of this people turn back unto their lord, even unto Rehoboam king of Judah; and they will kill me, and return to Rehoboam king of Judah.'

28 Whereupon the king took counsel, and made two calves of gold; and he said unto them: 'Ye have gone up long enough to Jerusalem; behold thy god(s), O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.'

29 And he set the one in Beth-el, and the other put he in Dan.

30 And this thing became a sin; for the people went to worship before the one, even unto Dan.

31 And he made houses of high places, and made priests from among all the people, that were not of the sons of Levi.

32 And Jeroboam ordained a feast in the eighth month, on the fifteenth day of the month, like unto the feast that is in Judah, and he went up unto the altar; so did he in Beth-el, to sacrifice unto the calves that he had made; and he placed in Beth-el the priests of the high places that he had made.

33 And he went up unto the altar which he had made in Beth-el on the fifteenth day in the eighth month, even in the month which he had devised of his own heart; and he ordained a feast for the children of Israel, and went up unto the altar, to offer.  
 
                                      (http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt09a12.htm#26)

 As well, according to the Kings text, Jeroboam ben Nebat, when announcing the two temples and the worship of the Golden Calf, used the exact words from Exodus 32 -- when the Jews at Sinai declared it as their divine ‘image’.

The only change is the word “behold” at the start instead of “This is” at Sinai. 

 
1 Kings ch 12

 
 
כח וַיִּוָּעַץ הַמֶּלֶךְ--וַיַּעַשׂ, שְׁנֵי עֶגְלֵי זָהָב; וַיֹּאמֶר אֲלֵהֶם, רַב-לָכֶם מֵעֲלוֹת יְרוּשָׁלִַם--הִנֵּה אֱלֹהֶיךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל, אֲשֶׁר הֶעֱלוּךָ מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם.
28 Whereupon the king took counsel, and
made two calves of gold; and he said
unto them: 'Ye have gone up long enough
 to Jerusalem; behold thy gods, O Israel,
which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.'
 


 

 
Exodus 32
 
 
ד וַיִּקַּח מִיָּדָם, וַיָּצַר
 אֹתוֹ בַּחֶרֶט, וַיַּעֲשֵׂהוּ, עֵגֶל מַסֵּכָה; וַיֹּאמְרוּ--אֵלֶּה אֱלֹהֶיךָ יִשְׂרָאֵל, אֲשֶׁר הֶעֱלוּךָ מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם.
4 And he [Aaron] received it at their hand, and fashioned it with a graving tool, and made it a molten calf; and they said: 'This is thy god, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.'
 
 http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0232.htm
 


NOTE: The above English translation of 1 Kings 12:28 uses the term ‘gods’ instead of ‘god’ due to the context and previous part of the sentence --  which mentions two calves.   The same logic is used to translate Exodus 32:4 where it is made singular in the English.

The Hebrew word  אֱלֹהֶיךָ  for ‘god(s)’ is identical in both I Kings and Exodus!


Thereafter/Later Times
 
 
The book of Kings attests the continuation of at least the temple in Beth-el throughout the life of the Northern Kingdom of Israel to its destruction in 722 BCE  -- and even beyond.


King Jehu is described as worshipping there 100 years after Jeroboam ben Nebat (2Kings ch 10:29) and its continued use to 722 and thereafter is attested by 2Kings 17:24-28.  There, it records that the King of Assyria sent back a priest from exile to Beth-el to educate the new arrivals in the religion of the land.
 
The Beth-el temple and its Golden Calf survived until destroyed by the Judean king, Josiah (640- 608 BCE) according to 2Kings 23:15.



2 Kings ch 10
 
  כט רַק חֲטָאֵי יָרָבְעָם בֶּן-נְבָט, אֲשֶׁר הֶחֱטִיא אֶת-יִשְׂרָאֵל--לֹא-סָר יֵהוּא, מֵאַחֲרֵיהֶם: עֶגְלֵי, הַזָּהָב, אֲשֶׁר בֵּית-אֵל, וַאֲשֶׁר בְּדָן.


 
     
 


29 Howbeit from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, wherewith he made Israel to sin,
Jehu departed not from after them, the golden calves that were in Beth-el, and that were in Dan.   

 

     http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt09b10.htm

 

 


 
2 Kings ch 17
 
כד וַיָּבֵא מֶלֶךְ-אַשּׁוּר מִבָּבֶל וּמִכּוּתָה וּמֵעַוָּא וּמֵחֲמָת, וּסְפַרְוַיִם, וַיֹּשֶׁב בְּעָרֵי שֹׁמְרוֹן, תַּחַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל; וַיִּרְשׁוּ, אֶת-שֹׁמְרוֹן, וַיֵּשְׁבוּ, בְּעָרֶיהָ.
24 And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Avva, and from Hamath and Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel; and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof.
 
כה וַיְהִי, בִּתְחִלַּת שִׁבְתָּם שָׁם, לֹא יָרְאוּ, אֶת-יְהוָה; וַיְשַׁלַּח יְהוָה בָּהֶם אֶת-הָאֲרָיוֹת, וַיִּהְיוּ הֹרְגִים בָּהֶם.
25 And so it was, at the beginning of their dwelling there, that they feared not the LORD; therefore the LORD sent lions among them, which killed some of them.
 
כו וַיֹּאמְרוּ, לְמֶלֶךְ אַשּׁוּר לֵאמֹר, הַגּוֹיִם אֲשֶׁר הִגְלִיתָ וַתּוֹשֶׁב בְּעָרֵי שֹׁמְרוֹן, לֹא יָדְעוּ, אֶת-מִשְׁפַּט אֱלֹהֵי הָאָרֶץ; וַיְשַׁלַּח-בָּם אֶת-הָאֲרָיוֹת, וְהִנָּם מְמִיתִים אוֹתָם, כַּאֲשֶׁר אֵינָם יֹדְעִים, אֶת-מִשְׁפַּט אֱלֹהֵי הָאָרֶץ.
26 Wherefore they spoke to the king of Assyria, saying: 'The nations which thou hast carried away, and placed in the cities of Samaria, know not the manner of the God of the land; therefore He hath sent lions among them, and, behold, they slay them, because they know not the manner of the God of the land.'
 
כז וַיְצַו מֶלֶךְ-אַשּׁוּר לֵאמֹר, הֹלִיכוּ שָׁמָּה אֶחָד מֵהַכֹּהֲנִים אֲשֶׁר הִגְלִיתֶם מִשָּׁם, וְיֵלְכוּ, וְיֵשְׁבוּ שָׁם; וְיֹרֵם, אֶת-מִשְׁפַּט אֱלֹהֵי הָאָרֶץ.
27 Then the king of Assyria commanded, saying: 'Carry thither one of the priests whom ye brought from thence; and let them go and dwell there, and let him teach them the manner of the God of the land.'
 
כח וַיָּבֹא אֶחָד מֵהַכֹּהֲנִים, אֲשֶׁר הִגְלוּ מִשֹּׁמְרוֹן, וַיֵּשֶׁב, בְּבֵית-אֵל; וַיְהִי מוֹרֶה אֹתָם, אֵיךְ יִירְאוּ אֶת-יְהוָה.
28 So one of the priests whom they had carried away from Samaria came and dwelt in Beth-el, and taught them how they should fear the LORD.
 
                                                       http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt09b17.htm

 
2 Kings ch 23
      
טו וְגַם אֶת-הַמִּזְבֵּחַ אֲשֶׁר בְּבֵית-אֵל, הַבָּמָה אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה יָרָבְעָם בֶּן-נְבָט אֲשֶׁר הֶחֱטִיא אֶת-יִשְׂרָאֵל--גַּם אֶת-הַמִּזְבֵּחַ הַהוּא וְאֶת-הַבָּמָה, נָתָץ; וַיִּשְׂרֹף אֶת-הַבָּמָה הֵדַק לְעָפָר, וְשָׂרַף אֲשֵׁרָה.
15 Moreover the altar that was at Beth-el, and the high place which Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin, had made, even that altar and the high place he [Josiah] broke down; and he burned the high place and stamped it small to powder, and burned the Asherah.

                                                         http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt09b23.htm

Tuesday, 16 April 2013


MISCONCEPTIONS

Idol Worship

When I was a teenager, I had as one of my teachers a highly regarded Orthodox rabbi .

One day, when studying the Haggadah of Passover and coming to the passage  Ovday kochavim ...., i.e., “Our ancestors worshipped the stars”,  our teacher suddenly stopped, looked at us and said: Do you really believe the people who invented mathematics, science, architecture and cities actually believed that a statue made by some carver or stone mason was an actual god?   No, they used these statues to focus their thoughts.

At the time, I found this quite startling. After all, we were all taught in kindergarten the story of Abraham, Terach and the idols. 

Terach made his living as an idol sculptor, and one night young Abraham snuck into the studio and broke the statues to pieces.  Next day, Terach saw the broken pieces and Abraham more or less said: “See dad, they are not really gods, just stone .... and I am not divinely punished.  (Though his father may have consequenced Abraham for destroying weeks of commissioned work.)

 Also, Psalm 115, read near the end of the Haggadah and which is part of the full Hallel (recited on the 3 major festivals of Passover, Shavuot and Succot)  states:

Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake. 2 Wherefore should the heathen say, Where is now their God?  3 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.
4 Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.  
5 They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not:                                          
6 They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not:                                             
7 They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat. 

            8 They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusts in them.        (King James Version)

 
 But once I became more familiar with ancient history, my teacher’s comments made good sense.

The Greeks, for example, worshipped Zeus and his home on Mount Olympus was marked by his great temple and statue.

As Wikipedia notes:

[The] statue of Zeus ... was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. The Chryselephantine statue was approximately 13 m (43 ft) high and was made by the sculptor Phidias in his workshop on the site at Olympia. He took about twelve years to complete it. On his head was a sculpted wreath of olive sprays. In his right hand he held a figure of Nike, the goddess of victory, also made from ivory and gold, and in his left hand, a scepter made with many kinds of metal, with an eagle perched on the top. His sandals were made of gold and so was his robe. His garments were carved with animals and with lilies. The throne was decorated with gold, precious stones, ebony, and ivory. The statue was the most famous artistic work in Greece.

But temples and statues of Zeus were commonplace as all Greeks were to worship him. Athens had a great temple to Zeus, and another for the popular and powerful sun god, Apollo. And around the Mediterranean, Apollo was worshiped in some 15 known temples. (See Wikipedia, “Catalog of Temples of Apollo”.)
 

The tradition of using stone, wood, gold and bronze statues to focus prayer and worship has also been preserved in Christianity.   While the second commandment prohibits making any images of God, Christianity, unlike Judaism and Islam, has commemorated the seminal moment in its version of monotheism  in the image of the crucified Jesus.  Every church has a central crucifix and most display some artist’s carving or other reproduction of Jesus on the cross.

Christians have this image in their homes, around their necks and in their cars.  Catholics also pray to statues of their saints, which abound in their churches and religious areas.   And St. Christopher medals and dashboard stick-on statues are common to protect travellers and sailors.

 

So, the insight of my old teacher/rabbi is important. 

“Idol worship” is too simplistic an understanding of ancient religions.  Only the most simple and ignorant of pagans would have believed the statutes were ‘alive’.   

As with Christians, it was and is a way to focus one’s thoughts and worship.

 

So why does the 2nd commandment forbid this? 

 

As Rambam stresses in his 13 Articles of Faith, despite Biblical language and imagery of a finger of God, hand of God or words from God  (requiring a mouth, tongue and vocal cords in humans):

3. I believe with perfect faith that G-d does not have a body. Physical    concepts do not apply to Him. There is nothing whatsoever that resembles Him at all.  (from ou.org)

 

God is ethereal and He is distorted and diminished by conceptualization in human or animal shape, and representation in stone, wood, bronze, gold or any other man-made object.

 

As the title of this blog notes,

 1 Kings 19

11 The Lord said [to Elijah], “Go out and stand on the mountain in the presence of the Lord, for the Lord is about to pass by.”

Then a great and powerful wind tore the mountains apart and shattered the rocks before the Lord, but the Lord was not in the wind. After the wind there was an earthquake, but the Lord was not in the earthquake. 12 After the earthquake came a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire. And after the fire came a still small voice ( or a gentle whisper).

13 When Elijah heard it, he pulled his cloak over his face and went out and stood at the mouth of the cave.

Monday, 15 April 2013

 

HISTORY, ARCHAEOLOGY and Biblical Criticism


HEBREW, Ktav Ahsuri and Biblical Criticism’s fallacy

Ktav Ashuri

To read Hebrew, one needs to learn the square-shaped script used in books, newspapers and other print, and a second, substantially different cursive or hand writing script. (The two are as different as English print from English pen and paper writing.)  And, if you study the Torah and Talmud, you will need to learn the French script used by the great medieval commentator, Rashi.  

So having Hebrew writing in three separate scripts is simply accepted as normal. 

 

                                                             modern Hebrew print - Ktav Ashuri



      modern Hebrew handwriting
 

 
                                                                           Rashi script

 

But I was shocked, as was my shul’s rabbi, when an article from a highly regarded Orthodox website mentioned the script used for writing Torah scrolls, Mezuzahs and Tephilin today did not date back to Moses but was introduced by Ezra after the Babylonian exile. It is called Ktav Ashuri.  And the earlier Hebrew script is called Ktav Ivri (named Paleo-Hebrew by archaeologists.)
 

The source cited is the Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin, where it is stated:

21 b

Mar Zutra or, as some say, Mar 'Ukba said: Originally the Torah was given to Israel in Hebrew characters and in the sacred [Hebrew] language; later, in the times of Ezra,46 the Torah was given in Ashshurith script47 and Aramaic language. [Finally], they selected for Israel48 the Ashshurith script and Hebrew language, leaving the Hebrew characters and Aramaic language for the hedyototh.

 

22a

And the writing of the letter was written in the Aramaic character and interpreted into the Aramaic [tongue].1 And again it is written, And they could not read the writing nor make known to the king the interpretation thereof.2 Further, it is written: And he shall write the copy [mishneh] of this law,3 — in writing which was destined to be changed.4 Why is it called Ashshurith? — Because it came with them from Assyria

 

Sanhedrin 22a  includes two other explanations rejecting the Assyrian/Aramaic link, but The Jerusalem Talmud concurs with the Ezra origin as did the ritual hand signs used to anoint the High Priest and also Davidic kings according to the Mishna. (See http://jtf.org/forum/index.php?topic=60882.0)

The Ashuri script, copied from Aramaic, has square lettering and frequent 90° angles.  It is radically different from Ktav Ivri which is more angular, and which archaeologists have shown is related to the earliest alphabet scripts known.  (See more below under Biblical Criticism).

For Ezra to introduce such a major change to Holy Scripture is consistent with the many challenges of the Babylonian Exile era, and his efforts to revive Torah knowledge, including introducing public Torah readings on the market days of Monday and Thursday.

 


                   Torah scroll Ktav Ashur letters with ornate ‘crown’ serifs
                                                           



 
Hebrew letter    Paleo-Hebrew letter    English Name
אAlephAleph
בBetBet
גGimelGimel
דDaledDalet
הHehHe
וVavWaw
זZayinZayin
חKhetHeth
טTetTeth
יYudYodh
כ/ךKhofKaph
לLamedLamedh
מ/םMemMem
נ/ןNunNun
סSamekhSamekh
עAyinAyin
פ/ףPeyPe
צ/ץTzadiTsade
קQufQoph
רReshResh
שShinShin
תTofTaw



In some of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Biblical text is in Ktav Ashuri but references to God are kept in the earlier Ktav Ivri (Paleo-Hebrew). The ancient Hebrew script was also used for coinage by the Hasmonean kings , during the Great Rebellion of 66-73 CE, and by Bar Kochvah.  (See Wikipedeia, “Paleo-Hebrew alphabet”)

 




 
                                                  Bar Kochvah coin


 

Hebrew and the first human language

Rashi has an interesting commentary on Genesis 2:23 which describes the creation of the first woman from the rib of the first man.

 He points out that the word for ‘woman’ אשה comes from the same root as the word for ‘man’ איש, the ה ending being the standard Hebrew grammatical device to differentiate male from female.

He therefore concludes this is proof that Hebrew was the original language of all human beings.

Using Rashi’s logic, one could argue that English (man – woman) or Spanish’s versions of Mr.- Mrs. (señor – señora) or Italian (signore – signora) could have been the first human languages, but English,  Spanish, Italian and all current European languages are of Medieval origin.

And, as Biblical scholar James L. Kugel admits, no other Semitic or early language had such a common root for the words for male and female. It is uniquely Hebrew!  (Kugel, How to Read the Bible, 2008, p. 86)

Kugel, however, following modern linguistic theory and Biblical Criticism’s mindset, argues at length (pp. 87-88) that Biblical Hebrew shows not just dialect variations between texts but an overall evolution over time with sound shifts from a simpler, original (not yet discovered)  language named “Proto-Semitic” by linguists.

That Biblical Hebrew has indicators of change and evolution --  just as English has evolved since Shakespeare’s day -- does not preclude Hebrew from being the first, and original human tongue; or that theoretical ‘proto-Semitic’ was not the original Hebrew dialect.

So, if no other ancient language and culture envisioned man and woman as a single root word and linked creation, and the Hebrew of Moses’ time, and thereafter is related to the ‘earliest’ ancestral language via Ktav Ivri,,  then Rashi’s insight, and the long Jewish and Christian traditions that God and Adam and Eve spoke Hebrew, makes sense.

 

Biblical Criticism Fallacy

For the longest time it was generally believed that the Greeks invented the alphabet, and all other alphabets were later descendents – including Hebrew.  The date for this Greek invention was sometime after 800 BCE and some scholars thought it even more recent, based on speculation of the date of Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey. (See Wikipedia, “Homer”)  

This standard ‘history’ affected Biblical Criticism from its beginnings in the late 17th century to its height with Wellhausen (1844 – 1918) in the early 20th century and their attitudes to the Hebrew Bible.

Put simply, even if the Greek alphabet dated as far back as 800 BCE, and the dissemination of this Greek invention was quick, and the Jews were sharp, an alphabet writing system for Hebrew could not have been invented and Biblical literature written down much before the destruction of the Northern Kingdom  and the exile of the Ten Tribes in 722 BCE.  (And if, as some thought, the Greek alphabet was only invented in the mid-7th century, the Hebrew alphabet would most likely not have arisen and used until the time of the Babylonian exile of 586 BCE.!)

A post-Babylonian date for Hebrew writing was also supported on another front. Hebrew square shaped letters are clearly related to and a copy from the script used for Aramaic by the Assyrians, Babylonians and Persians thereafter. And the most likely, earliest time for Jews to be exposed to Aramaic would be during the post-Babylonian exile era, i.e., after 586 BCE.

 

So, whether relying on the accepted history of the Greek alphabet, or using the Aramaic connection, it seemed clear to scholars that Hebrew writing was, at the earliest, an adaptation just before 722 BCE, or more likely created 150 years later.

Consequently,  all Hebrew documents purporting to be ‘authentic’ written texts from ancient times would, automatically, be ‘pious fakes’: combining ancient folklore and tales, myths and fictitious personalities and events.  After all, they were not written down when claimed and any direct quotes of what someone – or God -- said, was not reliable and concocted.   

By this yardstick, the following parts of the Hebrew Bible or Tanach were rejected:

1. The Pentateuch (supposedly written in ancient Moses times)

2. Book of Joshua

3. Judges

4. Samuel 1 and 2

5. King 1  

6. Ruth

7. Book of Psalms (many by King David)

8. Proverbs  (King Solomon)

 9. Ecclesiastes (King Solomon)

10. Song of Songs (King Solomon)

11.Amos

12. Hosea

13. Michah

14. Isaiah  (partly if post -586 BCE)


15. Zephaniah  (if post -586 BCE)

16. Habakkuk  (if post -586 BCE)

17. Jeremiah (partly if post -586 BCE)

18. Ezekiel   (partly if post -586 BCE)



However, we have known for some time that Greek was not the first alphabet (though it did lead to Latin, Italian, French, German and English thanks to the Roman Empire, and was directly the origin of Slavic language Cyrillic writing when later missionaries went from Greece to spread the Christian Gospel to Eastern Europe in the 9th century CE.)

Thanks to archaeology, we now know the Greeks copied and expanded on the alphabet used by Phoenician (Lebanese) traders – adding, most notably, symbols for vowel sounds.

Moreover, living evidence of a far older, pre-Greek alphabet has been around for centuries among the Samaritans, that people which the Assyrians relocated to the land of the 10 tribes (Israel) in 722 BCE.  While reduced to under 800 people today, they have continued for centuries to worship the god of their new land – as was standard ancient practice  (except for us stubborn Jews), built a temple on their central Mount Grizim and continued their version of Judaism -- including coping their fairly accurate version of Torah scrolls in the original Hebrew, Ktav Ivri.  (See Wikipedia “Samaritans”.)

Archaeological finds have also shown that variants of Hebrew date back to  c. 1500 BCE and are the original alphabet family; the fragmentary finds giving the different scripts their names: starting with proto-Sinaitic, proto-Canaanite, paleo-Hebrew and Phoenician.

 

 
 


             Samaritan Torah scroll                                                                                

 Samaritan text

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In fact, the old idea that Semitic forms of the alphabet derived from Greek should have been rejected from the start.

 Hebrew, Phoenician and related alphabets do NOT have letter shapes for their vowel signs – but Greek does (the real novel ‘addition’ of the Greeks.)

Hebrew vowel letters did not appear until the Middle Ages even though the sounds: AH, A, EE, EH,  O and OO could have been easily copied based on the Greek model.

So, the Semitic Hebrew language family actually predates the Greek by close to a thousand years! 

Plenty of time for Moses, Joshua, Samuel, David, Solomon and the others to have access to Hebrew alphabet writing – in ktav Ivri.

 

 
Sorry Egypt and sorry Mesopotamia

The invention of the alphabet is one of the great developments in human history, and it is not, for all the huffing and puffing, either Egyptian or Mesopotamian.

Egypt and Mesopotamia were two of the greatest early civilizations and were masters of agricultural, manufacturing, boat building, architecture, medicine, science and mathematics, but on the writing front, they were not the best.

Yes, Cuneiform and Hieroglyphics (and its cursive version, Hieratic) were the earliest written languages in the Middle East if not the world, now dated back to the middle 4th millennium, but they were not easy to learn or use, and never converted to an alphabet system even when Semitic alphabets were already around.

 

Difficulties of Hieroglyphics (Hieratic) and Cuneiform

1. They were syllabic systems combining a consonant and vowel sound per ‘letter’ and as a result had well over 600 symbols to memorize.

2. Both languages were time and space consuming.  Egyptian hieroglyphics stayed with ‘pictures’ and required patience to draw ½ dozen different bird shapes accurately. Royalty even got special treatment as their names would be put in ovals called cartouches, and within a cartouche the picture symbols would often be arranged differently at the writer/artist’s preference and picture sizes.

Cuneiform’s wedge shaped writing was, for most words, not any easier than Hieroglyphics. To write most ‘letters’ one had to drag, lift and press down one’s triangle shaped stylus 10 or more times!

 

 

Egyptian tomb with hieroglyphic wall writing

  Book of the Dead (Egyptian prayers)



cartouche of Pharaoh Tutankhamen
 


 


                                                                                        

                                                Notice the different birds.







                                          cuneiform texts

                                                                                   

 
 
By comparison, any alphabet system, whether just 22 letters or 45, is easy.

1. Any 6 or 7 year old child can learn all the letters and basic reading and writing in a year or two of schooling --  as opposed to the 6 or more years needed by Egyptian and Mesopotamian students.

2. The simpler alphabet shapes take far less time and space.

 
As a result of these advantages, literacy beyond a 1% to 3% elite became possible.

Only the invention of the printing press by Gutenberg has done more for public education and learning!

 

                                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

So, what are the implications of the above?

1. Torah scroll Ktav Ashuri was a change introduced by Ezra, around copying Assyrian, Aramaic script. 

2. The earlier Ktav Ivri alphabet family dates back to before Moses’ time and was available for writing the Chumash/Pentateuch, and all the other, later Hebrew Holy Scriptures that early Biblical Critics automatically dismissed as ‘fakes’.

3. Hebrew may well be the oldest language on Earth as per Rashi’s comment on Genisis 2:23.

 
4. Finally, the written alphabet may be a Jewish invention, if not a Divine one.         It was truly revolutionary and beyond the ingenuity of  the Egyptians to the south or the early Mesopotamians to the north.  And its timelines and Sinai-Canaan origins match the Jewish experience.

         
                Hollywood Moses, Charlton Hesston, holding The 10 Commandments
                                                  in ktav vri (paleo-Hebrew)