Tuesday, 24 January 2017

MISCONCEPTIONS and CULTURAL CONTEXT


Why start at Berashit?

Rashi begins his commentary to Genesis by citing his father, Rabbi Isaac, who asked: Why does the Bible start with Creation when it only needed to begin with the Exodus and the first commandment to the Jewish people (Exodus 12:2)?  Rabbi Isaac’s own answer was that God wanted the peoples of the world to know that the Land of Canaan was to be given as an eternal inheritance to the children of Israel -- as God is the Creator and owner of all lands.[1]  

This eternal promise, often repeated in the Chumash and Tanach[2], is the legal argument that has been at the heart of Jewish claims for a restoration of a Jewish state and the  Promised Land for some 2000 years prior to 1948 and even to the present.

Rabbi Isaac's question and answer, however, miss a fundamental point that was not an issue in his day, the 11 century C.E., as the world of Jewry was either under Christian or Islamic rule -- and both those faiths accepted the Bible's Genesis ch 1 Creation as divine truth.

But in the ancient world, prior to Emperor Constantine (ruled 306 to 337 CE) and his conversion to Christianity and efforts to eradicate Paganism and make Christianity the official religion of the world empire, there was a long tradition of diverse Creation narratives.

As Stephen Hawking notes[3], there is a universal, basic impulse in every culture and religion to answer fundamental questions:  How did the world we see come about?  How do we humans fit into the 'plan'?

He gives the Creation tradition of the Boshongo people of central Africa as an example.

A fuller version is available at  http://www.mircea-eliade.com/from-primitives-to-zen/051.html and below is my own  summary and wording.

At the start, there was only darkness and water and the flat earth.  One day, Bumba, the great god, felt pain in his stomach and vomited up the sun. The sun dried up some of the water, leaving land and sandbanks and reefs visible.  Bumba, continued to suffer pain, and vomited up the moon and the stars. The pain continued and he vomited up various primal animals who in turn created all the animals: the heron created all the birds, the goat all horned animals, the beetle all insects, etc.  And finally, he vomited up various humans only one of which was white.

Bambu’s three (3) sons tried to add their own creations but only produced ants and the kite, though Chonganda, the second son, did create a marvelous living plant from which all the world’s trees and grasses and flowers and other plants have sprung forth.


Ancient Middle East
                                                           
In the ancient Fertile Crescent, with Egypt to the south and a series of overlapping great civilizations in the Mesopotamian north, two Creation traditions were long established by the time of Abraham.

Abraham and Lot and Terach and Laban were all part of that northern culture and familiar with its popular religious beliefs and Creation tradition, and, if nothing else, Moses, the Egyptian raised prince, and the Children of Israel who lived in Egypt for generations must have been well aware of Egyptian beliefs re: creation.


The Northern view:

The ancient Cuneiform text, called Enuma Elis, first discovered in 1849 in the ruins of Nineveh and later at Babylon, dates back to Hammurabi and represents an even older, oral tradition.[4]

The epic poem describes the creation of the gods from primeval deities Apsu (fresh water) and Tiamat (salt water) and how when Tiamat became pregnant with many offspring who groined inside her, Apsu plotted their murder so he could have peace and quiet. But Tiamat refused and had Ea, the god of magic, still inside her, kill Apsu and emerge as the new male ruler.  He in turn marries Damkina and produces Marduk, who has the power to create winds and tornados.

Eventually, a war of the gods erupts between Tiamat and her fetal deities and new monsters she creates on the one side, and Marduk and the other gods who agreed to have Marduk as their leader and chief god thereafter.

In a climactic battle, Marduk faces off against Tiamat, kills her and cuts her body in half: one part forming the earth and the other, the skies. He then creates and arranges the planets and stars, the moon and the sun.

Finally, he kills Tiamat’s new husband, Kingu, and uses his blood to create humanity – so they could serve the gods.


Greek connection[5]

The creation poem, Theogony, by the Greek poet, Hesiod (c. 7th century BCE) echoes this ancient Mesopotamian view: incestuous families of gods, intergenerational wars, primary-gods swallowing their offspring to eliminate competitors, and the eventual defeat of the older generation by the younger. 

The Greek Uranus (Sky), son and husband of Gaia (Earth), is the Apsu figure and imprisons his first offspring within the belly of Gaia. He too is overthrown by Cronus, a son, who is thereafter the new leader of the ruling Titan generation.  In turn, Cronus swallows all chidren he fathers with sister/wife Rhea but eventually Zeus, who has been hidden, leads a revolt and after a battle of 10 years the Olympians are victorious and Zeus, their elected leader, becomes the chief god and ruler.

Humans, in this tradition, were intended to be amusement for the gods, but Prometheus, assigned to their creation, formed them from clay mud to stand erect like the gods; and he had Athena breathe life into these figurines and give them a share of her intelligence.  Prometheus also gave them fire[6].

In this Greek account, then, the sky, planet Earth and water have remained unchanged , and in their current  forms forever, and  pre-existed  Cronus and the Titan gods and Zeus and the Olympians: with both groups living on the  mountain tops of Greece.
Zeus, when born, was also hidden in a cave in the island of Crete.

Finally, the sun, in Greek mythology, is simply the Olympian god Apollo riding across the sky in his golden chariot.

And the defeated Titan giant, Atlas, must stand on the western edge of the flat Earth (Gaia) and hold upon his shoulders the equally flat sky (Uranus) so the two cannot touch; i.e., so they cannot mate and produce as before powerful and divisive gods. So, the blue zone above is the sky god, while the transparent air close to the ground is a ‘gap’ created by Atlas’s body and uplifting arms[7].


Ancient Egypt

Originally there was Nu (Chaos), dark water encompassing the vastness. Then, a hill (Ben Ben) emerged and upon it arose the god Atum. He was lonely and spontaneously gave birth to the gods Shu (air) and Tafnet (moisture). After they left him to create all things, Atum eventually became worried, and sent his eye to look for them. When the eye returned, brought back by Shu and Tafnet, Atum wept for joy.  And when his tears touched the soil of the Ben Ben, humans were born.

Now Shu and Tafnet  gave birth to Geb (earth) and Nut (sky), and the latter siblings fell in love but Atum disapproved.  So Atum separated the two placing Nut (sky) high up above Geb (earth). But Geb was already pregnant and gave birth to five (5) gods:  Osiris, Isis, Set, Nephthys, and Horus.

When Atum saw how intelligent and wise was Osirus, he made Osirus the chief god of the world, and simply left.

Osiris married his sister Isis and they ruled jointly. Osiris created Egypt and the Nile as the most perfect of lands.

But Set, Osiris’s brother, tricked Osiris to squeeze into a chest, locked it and threw it into the Nile.  He then claimed Osiris had died and he would rule next.

Isis did not despair and eventually found the chest and planned to use magical herbs to restore him. But Set intervened: he found the chest’s new location and cut the body of Osiris into 42 pieces which he flung throughout Egypt. 

Isis found 41 pieces eventually; all except for the penis which a fish had swallowed.  Undaunted, she replaced the organ and they mated giving birth to Horus. Thereafter, Osiris left and became the ruler and judge of the underworld, the land of the dead.

Horus, after a war of 80 years, overthrew Set and governed thereafter with the advice of isis and her sister Nepthys.[8]


Genesis vs. the above

The ancient mythologies of Mesopotamia, inherited, it seems, by the Greeks as well, and even that of Egypt,  are markedly and fundamentally different from the Bible.

No pantheon and multiplicity of deities.  No rivalry and infanticide, patricide or fratricide.

And no fixation on struggles for control and power and rule over the world and universe.

Instead, there is a clear and singular diety.  One who creates with joy: constantly saying “it is good.” And, at the end, “It is very good.”

And the steps or process of creation are addressed systematically and directly, with enough detail to meet the curiosity of ordinary humans re: the fundamental elements of life on Earth: land, sky, rain clouds and flowing land based rivers and seas and oceans;  fixed cycles of the Sun, Moon and Stars; vegetation; creatures of the sea, animals of the land and air; and, finally, as the epitome and ultimate achievement of creation, humans.

The basic human questions of “How did this all begin?” and “How do we fit into the ‘plan’? “  are addressed.

And with the repeated “It was good.” and closing, “It was very good.”, a deep, human psychological need was met as well. 


Consequently, to have the Chumash begin at the Exodus and omit describing the creation of the world and all life on earth would have been a disservice  to the Jewish people as ordinary humans trying to better understand their world, and, more importantly,  would have left them without a rebuttal or response to the Creation mythologies believed by  the mighty cultures and nations among which they dwelt:  Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and ultimately Greco-Roman.


Put simply, Creation (Genesis ch 1 -2:3) is there to set the record straight and help clarify and defend monotheism


Importance of Context

As I have stated at the outset of this blog, the Patriarchs and all ensuing generations of Jews did not live in a vacuum, but were exposed to and part of the greatest and most culturally dynamic area of the ancient world, the Fertile Crescent.
Hertz, in his Chumash, recognized full well that Judaism cannot ignore archaeological evidence that restores the real, if lost, past[9]; and we, to better understand the Torah and Chumash, must not ignore such real evidence, or we do so at our peril.



[1] Rashi to Genesis 1:1

[2] Genesis 15:18-21, Gensis 26:3, Gensis 28:13,  Numbers 34:1-12,  Leviticus 26:42-45. Deuteronomy 1:8 Isaiah 43:5,6.  Jeremiah 31:8-10, Ezekiel 36:19, 24, 28;  Ezekiel 37:11, 12, 21, 25,  Zechariah 2:12.; Zechariah 8:7, 8, 22;   Zecharia 12:6, Amos 9:15.

[3]  http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-origin-of-the-universe.html


[4] See Wikipedia “Enuma Elis”
[5]  I do not include Hesiod’s other story of human creation called “The 5 Ages of Man” as it clearly was not of ancient origin and is an allegory.  It sees 5 epoch in which humans were created and then died out;  naturally or violently, one after the other until the time of Hesiod.  Each time a god invents or reinvents humanity and there is a decline from a golden age of simplicity and happiness through an age of heroes and adventure –to the present 5th epoch of ordinary morals and daily life.  Cronus created the first Golden Age, Zeus the Silver Age which he destroys. Zeus again creates mankind in the Bronze Age, a race filled with violence and disrespect for the Gods which ended in self destruction( though another sources blame a divine deluge). The 4th epoch created by Zeus was the Age of Heroes: Hercules, Jason and the warriors of Trojan war.  This human race also died out and Zeus started afresh a 5th time with the current iron Age of ordinary mortals with short lives filled with troubles.
See http://www.greek-gods.org/mythology/five-ages-of-man.php
[6] See http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/creation.html#Hesiod; http://www.desy.de/gna/interpedia/greek_myth/creationMan.html
[7] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_(mythology)    Images of Atlas holding a globe – either the Earth itself or the Celestial sphere of the sun and moon and stars -- are misunderstandings of the original Atlas tale.
[8] See https://www.ancient.eu/Egyptian_Mythology/, For regional variations, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_creation_myths. For more on Atum, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atum
[9] Hertz, J. H., The Pentateuch and Haftorahs (1958). He addresses Enuma Elis and other findings re: the Book of Gensis on p. 193 and thereafter.  

Monday, 23 January 2017

UNDERSTANDING THE BIBLE: TRANSLATIONS

Tohu VaVohu

Genesis 1:2 uses Tohu VaVohu to describe the earth at the start of Creation.

Rashi translates these words to mean astonishingly empty and even uses the old French term to highlight this. The Jerusalem Targum elaborates that the earth was vacant and desolate and without humans or animal life.[1]

The Art Scroll Chumash follows Rashi in its translation emphasizing the lack of animal and human life (let alone vegetation).  And so too the ancient Vulgate which uses the Latin terms for empty (inanis) and vacant (vacua)[2].


However, The Jewish Publication Society (1917) translation, which is also used by Hertz, the Soncino Chumash and online Mechon Mamre, understands Tohu VaVohu to refer to the physical ‘make up’ and appearance of a still forming land mass: ”the earth was unformed and void”.

This is also the reading of the 1611 King James version (“the earth was without form, and void”) and goes back to the 3rd century BCE Greek Septuagint (”the earth was unsightly and unfurnished”).[3]

Richard Friedman in his translation, The Bible with Sources Revealed (2003), agrees with the latter and translates the section clearly as “the earth had been shapeless and formless”.

So which is the Bible’s intended ‘understanding’?   Vacant of vegetation and life or in primordial physical formation?




Below, I suggest the latter view of Tohu VaVohu is the intended one, based in part on the usage and understandings of Jeremiah and Isaiah.


The only other time the  words Tohu and Vohu are juxtaposed in the Tanach is Jeremiah 4:23: in a passage that echoes Genesis and warns how God will destroy the land of Judah and Zion as punishment and revert it to the primeval state of Genesis's opening.

The only other time Vohu appears at all in the Tanach is Isaiah 34:11, where Tohu appears just two words before it.


Poetic style

Tohu and Vohu are synonyms[4], and their repeated use back to back, or almost back to back, is noteworthy.

Repetition is a standard device in literature and especially if the work is meant to be read aloud to a crowd.  It reinforces the idea.

As well, Tohu VaVohu is extraordinarily poetic.

Even when transliterated, the end rhyme -- uncommon in Biblical Hebrew -- is obvious. 

There is also internal rhyme of the 'o' sound and the two 'V's literally back to back in the Hebrew script. 

Finally, there is a melodic rise and fall and rise and fall quality to the duo as the 'o' are high pitch and the 'u' sound are bass.  The sound of the two  words together is like a roller coaster of highs and lows.


Jeremiah and Isaiah

Jeremiah uses Tohu VaVohu in ch 4, verse 23 in a clear echo of Genesis' opening and follows up in the very next verse with the details of mountains quaking and hills shaking.

Here is the passage:


כב  כִּי אֱוִיל עַמִּי, אוֹתִי לֹא יָדָעוּ--בָּנִים סְכָלִים הֵמָּה, וְלֹא נְבוֹנִים הֵמָּה; חֲכָמִים הֵמָּה לְהָרַע, וּלְהֵיטִיב לֹא יָדָעוּ.
22 For My people is foolish, they know Me not; they are sottish children, and they have no understanding; they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.
כג  רָאִיתִי, אֶת-הָאָרֶץ, וְהִנֵּה-תֹהוּ, וָבֹהוּ; וְאֶל-הַשָּׁמַיִם, וְאֵין אוֹרָם.
23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was waste and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
כד  רָאִיתִי, הֶהָרִים, וְהִנֵּה, רֹעֲשִׁים; וְכָל-הַגְּבָעוֹת, הִתְקַלְקָלוּ.
24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved to and fro.
כה  רָאִיתִי, וְהִנֵּה אֵין הָאָדָם; וְכָל-עוֹף הַשָּׁמַיִם, נָדָדוּ.
25 I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
כו  רָאִיתִי, וְהִנֵּה הַכַּרְמֶל הַמִּדְבָּר; וְכָל-עָרָיו, נִתְּצוּ מִפְּנֵי יְהוָה--מִפְּנֵי, חֲרוֹן אַפּוֹ.  {ס}
26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful field was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and before His fierce anger. {S}
כז  כִּי-כֹה אָמַר יְהוָה, שְׁמָמָה תִהְיֶה כָּל-הָאָרֶץ; וְכָלָה, לֹא אֶעֱשֶׂה.
27 For thus saith the LORD: The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end.


As the passage is a reference to Genesis ch 1 and its reversal, it seems to suggest that, at least as Jeremiah understood it, Tohu VaVohu of Genesis 1:2, refers to the land's primeval surface undulating during the formation of hills and mountains.

And as Jeremiah addresses separately the absence of humans and animals (= the birds) in verse 25, he is clearly not in agreement with Rashi and the Jerusalem Targum.

His reference to shape and its irregularity, I believe, is also the intent and correct translation of Isaiah 34:11, the only other time that Tohu and Vohu appear together, and, in fact, is  the 3rd and last time Vohu is found anywhere in the Tanach.

 Isaiah Chapter 34 יְשַׁעְיָהוּ

יא  וִירֵשׁוּהָ קָאַת וְקִפּוֹד, וְיַנְשׁוֹף וְעֹרֵב יִשְׁכְּנוּ-בָהּ; וְנָטָה עָלֶיהָ קַו-תֹהוּ, וְאַבְנֵי-בֹהוּ.
11 But the pelican and the bittern shall possess it, and the owl and the raven shall dwell therein; and He shall stretch over it the line of confusion, and the plummet of emptiness.


The Jewish, JPS English translation above, and all Christian ones[5] which translate אַבְנֵי  “stones’ literally, make little sense


Here is the entire section and image:

ח  כִּי יוֹם נָקָם, לַיהוָה--שְׁנַת שִׁלּוּמִים, לְרִיב צִיּוֹן.
8 For the LORD hath a day of vengeance, a year of recompense for the controversy of Zion.
ט  וְנֶהֶפְכוּ נְחָלֶיהָ לְזֶפֶת, וַעֲפָרָהּ לְגָפְרִית; וְהָיְתָה אַרְצָהּ, לְזֶפֶת בֹּעֵרָה.
9 And the streams thereof shall be turned into pitch, and the dust thereof into brimstone, and the land thereof shall become burning pitch.
י  לַיְלָה וְיוֹמָם לֹא תִכְבֶּה, לְעוֹלָם יַעֲלֶה עֲשָׁנָהּ; מִדּוֹר לָדוֹר, תֶּחֱרָב--לְנֵצַח נְצָחִים, אֵין עֹבֵר בָּהּ.
10 It shall not be quenched night nor day, the smoke thereof shall go up for ever; from generation to generation it shall lie waste: none shall pass through it for ever and ever.
יא  וִירֵשׁוּהָ קָאַת וְקִפּוֹד, וְיַנְשׁוֹף וְעֹרֵב יִשְׁכְּנוּ-בָהּ; וְנָטָה עָלֶיהָ קַו-תֹהוּ, וְאַבְנֵי-בֹהוּ.
11 But the pelican and the bittern shall possess it, and the owl and the raven shall dwell therein; and He shall stretch over it the line of confusion, and the plummet of emptiness.
יב  חֹרֶיהָ וְאֵין-שָׁם, מְלוּכָה יִקְרָאוּ; וְכָל-שָׂרֶיהָ, יִהְיוּ אָפֶס.
12 As for her nobles, none shall be there to be called to the kingdom; and all her princes shall be nothing.
יג  וְעָלְתָה אַרְמְנֹתֶיהָ סִירִים, קִמּוֹשׂ וָחוֹחַ בְּמִבְצָרֶיהָ; וְהָיְתָה נְוֵה תַנִּים, חָצִיר לִבְנוֹת יַעֲנָה.
13 And thorns shall come up in her palaces, nettles and thistles in the fortresses thereof; and it shall be a habitation of wild-dogs, an enclosure for ostriches.
יד  וּפָגְשׁוּ צִיִּים אֶת-אִיִּים, וְשָׂעִיר עַל-רֵעֵהוּ יִקְרָא; אַךְ-שָׁם הִרְגִּיעָה לִּילִית, וּמָצְאָה לָהּ מָנוֹחַ.
14 And the wild-cats shall meet with the jackals, and the satyr shall cry to his fellow; yea, the night-monster shall repose there, and shall find her a place of rest.
טו  שָׁמָּה קִנְּנָה קִפּוֹז וַתְּמַלֵּט, וּבָקְעָה וְדָגְרָה בְצִלָּהּ; אַךְ-שָׁם נִקְבְּצוּ דַיּוֹת, אִשָּׁה רְעוּתָהּ.
15 There shall the arrowsnake make her nest, and lay, and hatch, and brood under her shadow; yea, there shall the kites be gathered, every one with her mate.
טז  דִּרְשׁוּ מֵעַל-סֵפֶר יְהוָה, וּקְרָאוּ--אַחַת מֵהֵנָּה לֹא נֶעְדָּרָה, אִשָּׁה רְעוּתָהּ לֹא פָקָדוּ:  כִּי-פִי הוּא צִוָּה, וְרוּחוֹ הוּא קִבְּצָן.
16 Seek ye out of the book of the LORD, and read; no one of these shall be missing, none shall want her mate; for My mouth it hath commanded, and the breath thereof it hath gathered them.
יז  וְהוּא-הִפִּיל לָהֶן גּוֹרָל, וְיָדוֹ חִלְּקַתָּה לָהֶם בַּקָּו; עַד-עוֹלָם, יִירָשׁוּהָ--לְדוֹר וָדוֹר, יִשְׁכְּנוּ-בָהּ.  {ס}
17 And He hath cast the lot for them, and His hand hath divided it unto them by line; they shall possess it for ever, from generation to generation shall they dwell therein

Isaiah again uses קַו  KAV in  ch 28:10 and 13 to symbolically mean strict justice: using the analogy and image of  קַו  KAV, the a rope/string line used in building and land boundary measurement -- which is only useful when stretched taut and straight. 

 As for Isaiah's use of Vohu with stones אַבְנֵי , stones are not 'empty' as normally translated, but they can be ‘unformed’ as in their natural state.


So I believe Isaiah 34:11 and surrounding verses is saying the following:

As punishment, the city will be destroyed and abandoned by humans and left to the animals of the wild

The measuring/plumb line, קַו  KAV, will lie slack: loose  and unused = Tohu, and the once hewn stones of its buildings and structures will be crumbled rubble. = Voho.

So, in brief, Tohu and its synonym Voho would mean ‘unformed, partially formed or misshapen.’

It is also noteworthy that both times Vohu appears in the Prophets, it is clearly associated with solid mass: stone, hills and mountains.

Consequently, taking this cue and especially Jeremiah’s clear reference to Genesis ch 1,     I offer the following translation and understanding of Genesis 1: 2.


ב  וְהָאָרֶץ, הָיְתָה תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ, וְחֹשֶׁךְ, עַל-פְּנֵי תְהוֹם; וְרוּחַ אֱלֹהִים, מְרַחֶפֶת עַל-פְּנֵי הַמָּיִם.
2 And the land was without set shape and without set form, and a wind from the Almighty undulated on the face of the water. 

Again, the melodic cadence of Tohu VaVohu echos such a state of primeval ongoing formation: namely, a land mass where the surface of hills and mountains are not yet set.

It is the roller coaster I earlier described based on the sound play of these rare and carefully chosen words.




[1] Jerusalem Targum is quoted by Hertz, J. H., The Pentateuch and Haftorahs (1958) p. 2.
[2] http://vulgate.org/ot/genesis_1.htm
[3] For JPS see http://biblehub.com/jps/genesis/1.htm.  See for JKV,  http://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/1.htm.  For Septuagint, see http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/physis/septuagint-genesis/1.asp.
[4] Strong’s Concordance Tohu = 8414 and Bohu = 922
[5] Bible Hub, Isaiah 34:11 multi=translations at http://biblehub.com/isaiah/34-11.htm